Soldier is Valued Even During Leisure Hours: Abrahamyan

If we say that a soldier is valuable to us, then he is valuable not only in the army barracks or combat positions but also during leisure hours. This was stated by Tigran Abrahamyan.

The Ministry of Defense, responding officially to the fact of a soldier’s death reported yesterday, declared that 'no death has been recorded in the army,' adding that 'the mentioned incident occurred at the deceased's place of residence, specifically at a farm.'

At the same time, the Ministry clarified that the deceased was not on duty at the time, stating that 'the incident has no relation to the service and cannot be classified as an event that occurred in the army.'

This indicates that the authorities continue to remain in the same spot, in this case, stuck in a quagmire. I continue to insist that the efforts of the authorities are directed more towards various cunning maneuvers, manipulations, and diverting the topic from the most critical to other platforms, rather than addressing the core issue.

It is likely that the main recipient of this message is not even the society, but directly Nikol Pashinyan, whom Papikyan remotely tries to convince that the situation is not so hopeless and that he is in control.

It is pointless to argue or persuade the public; you are the primary responsible parties for what has been created. But, ultimately, a soldier has died. The first task is to ascertain why. Then, to understand any connection to the service, including what measures could have been implemented to prevent this—ranging from psychological to supervisory aspects.

After all, if we say that a soldier is valuable to us, then he is valuable not only in the barracks or combat positions but also during leisure hours,” he noted.