Why has Artsakh not returned to the negotiation table?

Pashinyan, today looking directly into the eyes of the people of Artsakh, should say: how did he get the impression that Aliyev, who unleashed the April war and stabbed an Armenian soldier, is a “cultured and normal” person?

This was mentioned today in a Facebook post by the spokesperson of the Republican Party of Armenia, Eduard Sharmazanov. How did it happen that he abandoned the agreements made in St. Petersburg and Vienna that were beneficial for the Armenian side, and why was he inspired by Aliyev's so-called “peacefulness” while in the elevator in Dushanbe?

Why has Artsakh not returned to the negotiation table until now? Who are the treacherous forces operating in Artsakh that want to surrender the land? Who are, ultimately, the foreign agents mentioned by the Prime Minister of Iran?

Why are the commander and deputy commander of the Artsakh Defense Army, who are among our best military commanders, no longer in the army? And finally, who benefits from the illegal deprivation of freedom of the first President of Artsakh and his detention—Artsakh or Azerbaijan?

There are many questions, and there is experience in terms of answers. Fabricated stories about “Parisian gay waiters” and “highly classified documents,” oath ballads about an independent judicial system and the eradication of corruption, fairy tales about “quantum leap development” and the “magic wand,” fables aimed at the incompetent former leaders who lost the magic wand, and unskilled performances with themes like “I’m not guilty for being incapable; it’s all the anti-revolutionaries who are sabotaging” are rampant.

In summary, it’s a kindergarten full of new “games and tricks.” Amen, Moses Khorenatsi, who mourned for your “infant” king!